Incident of Morales video Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Incident of Morales video - Assignment ExampleWhen Phausts management is confronted by the honourable issues involved in hiring a critical person from the rival business the person in charge Chuck replies that Fred is under no non-disclosure agreement with Chemitoil. The good implications of such a decision are clear and should be avoided as far as possible. In a similar manner the management at Phaust finds out that Chemitoil is about to release a new paint remover known as Easy Strip so they decide to brand their own produce as Strip Teasy which sounds similar to the original products name. The contention is to promote sales by blurring out the customers brand specialisation so that customers going for Chemitoils product may accidentally buy Phausts product too. This is an honestly repugnant method to boost sales and represents an respectable dilemma even if the legal department allow it. Once the plant was cleared for construction, it was situated in Mexico in order to take clear expediency of the more lax environmental laws. The implementation of less stringent environmental laws would allow Phaust to construct the plant at a far lower follow than the cost of construction in the United States. While this would benefit Phaust in the short and long run merely such a decision would be very detrimental to the interests of many stakeholders in Mexico such as labour unions, people living in the adjacent localities, workers working at the plant amongst others. It was Phausts ethical responsibility to evaluate its decision and to match up salaries, environmental protection and the like before creating a plant in Mexico because ethical constraints take aim as such. As the construction of the plant proceeds the construction team is faced with the decision of lining the evaporating ponds in order to discourage the infiltration of gaga substances to drinking water nearby. There are no environmental protection laws in Mexico to supplant or require such a comm itment but it was the ethical responsibility of the construction team to ensure that the local drinking water supply was not affected by their actions. Failure to comply with ethical standards in order to curb costs reflects on the low ethical standards employed at Phaust. Moreover Phaust is represented as possessing a culture of race over safety. Though upper management might feel that this stratagem would promote efficacy and reduce waste but the implications are opposite to the desire effects. The promotion of speed forced Fred to founding a conventional plant using conventional design pressures and temperatures. Forcing the design team beyond their means in order to save time was an unethical violation of norms at Phaust. This in turn forced the construction and design teams to work up a design that was not up to the job as the new product from Chemitoil was analysed. The construction phase of the plant was filled up with unethical conduct as well. The procurance of expensiv e control systems from a person related to the higher management at Phaus is a clear violation of the code of ethics for engineering procurement. Utilising the currency in one such section would drain the construction in other places and the video shows this clearly as it proceeds. Similarly the uncalled for budget cuts across the come along were uncalled for and unethical to say the least as not formal assessments or evaluations were undertaken to determine the amount of cuts required. The removal of